ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Animal responses and physiological indicators of stress in late pregnant alpacas on cultivated pastures in the High Peruvian Andes.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of alpaca variety (Huacaya vs. Suri) and period on physiological parameters and stress indicators in late pregnancy, grazed on high-altitude cultivated pastures in Cusco, Peru (4,141 m.a.s.l). Eight Huacaya and six Suri alpacas were monitored in two experimental periods Transition (gestation months 8‒9) and Wet (gestation months 10-11), this last coinciding with the beginning of the rainy season. Data were analysed using a repeated measures model and Pearson correlations were established among selected variables. Regardless of variety, alpacas lost liveweight during the Transition period despite increased feed intake. Suri females displayed lower body temperatures (36.1 vs. 37.5 °C), and heart rates (60 vs. 65 beats/min) compared to Huacaya. No differences were associated either with variety or period in adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) or cortisol in blood serum. The albumin-to-globulin ratio was lower in Suris and increased in Wet period. Differences in pasture crude protein contents between periods may explain increases blood urea nitrogen (BUN; + 1.25 mg/dL) in Wet period, whereas creatinine (CREA) was responsive to both variety and period. Distinct stress responses in Huacaya and Suri alpacas were evidenced by cortisol-ACTH correlations. Huacaya exhibit a stable hormonal feedback loop, whereas Suri are more influenced by period. Both alpaca varieties displayed unexpected negative cortisol-glucose correlations and differed in cortisol-protein metabolism associations. Despite physiological differences, kidney function remained consistent for both varieties. These findings highlight unique metabolic adaptations in alpacas and underscore the need for further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42474825What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.