ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Association of a valve-less trocar system with operative efficiency and surgeon workload during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated whether use of a valve-less trocar system improves operative efficiency and surgeon workload during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Consecutive patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at a tertiary robotic surgery center between January 2023 and March 2026 were prospectively assigned to a valve-less trocar system (VTS) group or a conventional insufflation system (CIS) group according to alternating 3-month periods of system availability. The first 10 study cases were treated as a run-in period and excluded from the primary analysis. Co-primary outcomes were total operative time and surgeon workload assessed with the Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX). Secondary outcomes included objective workflow metrics, blood loss, postoperative recovery, postoperative nausea and vomiting, length of stay, and 30-day complications. Ninety patients were analyzed (45 VTS, 45 CIS). Total operative time was shorter with VTS than with CIS (144.8 ± 27.6 vs. 168.6 ± 31.8 min, p < 0.001). After adjustment, VTS use remained associated with a 19.4-min reduction in operative time (95% confidence interval - 27.8 to - 11.0; p < 0.001). VTS was also associated with fewer pressure-loss episodes, fewer manual smoke evacuations, fewer camera cleanings, and lower SURG-TLX scores across all domains. Early pain scores and postoperative nausea and vomiting favored VTS, whereas length of stay and 30-day complications were similar. During robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, use of a valve-less trocar system was associated with greater operative efficiency and lower surgeon workload.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42474824What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.