SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2026
Transfer of technical skills from virtual reality robotic simulation to non-virtual surgical performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The robotic PIANO: a critical narrative review of surgeon-controlled operative polyphony, human factors, and robotic training.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Virtual Reality Robotic Surgery Simulators (VR-RSS) are widely used, but their educational value depends on whether skills acquired in virtual reality (VR) training transfer to non-virtual performance. This review evaluated whether VR training improves transferable robotic surgical skills. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane from inception to March 3, 2026, for randomized trials evaluating VR robotic simulator training with transfer to non-virtual settings. Screening was performed in Rayyan. Data were extracted systematically, risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2, and random-effects meta-analyses using Hedges' g were conducted in R. Eight trials were included in the review, and seven were included in meta-analysis. Sample sizes ranged from 12 to 35 participants. Although the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for global technical skill scores favored the VR training group, it did not reach statistical significance (g = 0.77, 95% CI -0.64-2.18; p = 0.205). Task completion time was also shorter in the VR training group, but this difference was not statistically significant (g = 0.47, 95% CI -0.35-1.29; p = 0.164). This review suggests a potential benefit of VR-based robotic simulation for transferring trained skills to non-VR environments. Future studies should include larger sample sizes and longitudinal assessments using validated metrics to better characterize these trends.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42474823What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.