ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Operative performance evolution in robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy: an 884-case institutional experience.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remote-access thyroidectomy via the robotic transaxillary approach (RTAT) avoids an anterior cervical scar while providing a stable, magnified operative field. How a high-volume RTAT programme evolves across its full institutional lifespan-from initial case acquisition through deliberate expansion of surgical indications-has not been comprehensively characterised in the Western literature. Retrospective analysis of 884 consecutive RTAT procedures at a single tertiary referral centre. Cases were stratified into three chronological descriptive phases: early (cases 1-295), middle (cases 296-589), and late (cases 590-884). Era boundaries were defined a priori and were not optimised by formal breakpoint or CUSUM analysis. Operative extent, operative time data, conversion rate, postoperative complications, and access-specific morbidity were compared across eras. Independent predictors of operative time were assessed by multivariable linear regression in the 355 cases with complete operative time and covariate data. The cohort was 75.7% female (of 879 patients with documented sex); mean age was 45.1 ± 12.4 years. Among 355 cases with recorded operative time (40.2% of the cohort, predominantly from the early and middle eras), mean time fell from 159.7 ± 39.0 min (early) to 133.4 ± 34.5 min (middle; p < 0.001); late-era data were not systematically available. Total thyroidectomy rose from 42.0% to 50.0% across eras (p = 0.02); malignancy proportion increased from 8.5% to 14.9%; and mean specimen weight rose from 23.8 g to 31.9 g. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 6 patients (0.7%). Transient RLN weakness affected 40 patients (4.52%); no permanent palsy was recorded. Working-space dysaesthesia (2.49%) and brachial plexopathy (0.90%) were confined almost entirely to the early era. Chronological case number, total thyroidectomy, and BMI were independently associated with operative time (R² = 0.38). In 884 consecutive RTAT procedures, operative time declined across successive programme phases, access-specific morbidity fell substantially, and the case mix broadened toward bilateral resection and oncological disease without a corresponding rise in major complications. The absence of permanent RLN injury or hypoparathyroidism across the full series represents a noteworthy safety observation during a period of deliberate indication expansion. These findings contribute descriptive evidence supporting staged RTAT programme development at an experienced centre.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42474816What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.