ArticleArchives of virology2026
Type-specific sensitivity versus detection breadth in HPV diagnostics: improved analytical detection of HPV16/18 by nested PCR.
Article in Archives of virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate detection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is central to cervical cancer screening. Current diagnostic strategies increasingly prioritize broad-spectrum assays to maximize genotype coverage. However, theoretical genotype breadth does not necessarily translate into effective sample-level detection when clinically dominant targets are present at low copy number. Here, we evaluated this analytical trade-off using conventional PCR as a controlled experimental framework. Type-specific nested PCR assays targeting HPV16 and HPV18 were developed and applied to 41 cervical samples. Nested PCR showed markedly higher relative analytical sensitivity than single-round amplification and produced a greater proportion of specific and interpretable detections than the broad-spectrum consensus systems tested here (MY09/11 and GP5/6). HPV16 and/or HPV18 DNA was detected by nested PCR in 22/41 samples, whereas MY09/11 and GP5/6 detected 11/41 and 2/41 samples, respectively, under the tested conditions. These findings indicate that broad genotype coverage and effective detection of positive samples are distinct analytical properties. In settings where prevalent HPV targets occur at low abundance, a highly sensitive genotype-focused assay may reveal more target-positive samples than a broader but less sensitive consensus approach. The results are not intended to replace clinically validated broad-spectrum screening assays, but they support explicit preservation of per-target analytical sensitivity in reflex testing and future multi-target HPV assay design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.