ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Incidental bone marrow findings].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBone marrow incidentalomas are being detected with increasing frequency due to the growing use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It is essential to distinguish benign from malignant lesions that require further investigation.
objectivesThe aim is to describe the imaging characteristics to facilitate the practical differentiation between malignant and benign incidental findings in bone marrow.
methodsA narrative literature review focusing on a pattern-based approach to the spinal and extraspinal skeleton.
resultsThe signal characteristics, morphology, and location of the bone marrow incidentaloma are crucial for classifying the lesion. In the spine, classifying the lesion as diffuse, focal, microfocal, or regional helps limit the differential diagnoses. Osteolytic lesions are hypointense on T1w- and hyperintense on T2w-imaging; sclerotic lesions are signal-free on all sequences; and fatty lesions are hyperintense on both T1w- and T2w-imaging. The presence of micro- or macroscopic fat within a lesion is a criterion for benignity.
conclusionBy using a few MRI sequences and correlating them with X‑ray and computed tomography (CT) images, it is possible to reliably classify incidental bone marrow lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42474791What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.