ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026
Operative time in acetabular fracture fixation: predictors and impact on postoperative outcomes.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Letter to the editor on: "Operative time in acetabular fracture fixation: predictors and impact on postoperative outcomes".European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical fixation of acetabular fractures is technically demanding, and operative time is often treated as a surrogate for surgical complexity and a presumed driver of complications. Whether prolonged operative time reflects identifiable preoperative factors, and whether it independently worsens outcomes, remains unclear. We aimed to identify factors associated with prolonged operative time in acetabular fracture fixation and to determine whether longer operative time is associated with worse postoperative outcomes.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing surgical fixation for acetabular fracture at a single center with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. Operative time was dichotomized at the median (127 min) into short (≤ 127 min) and long (> 127 min) operative time groups.
resultsA total of 441 patients were included (222 short, 219 long). On univariate analysis, long operative time was associated with lower preoperative hemoglobin (11.8 ± 1.7 vs. 12.3 ± 1.7 g/dL, p = 0.001), high-energy trauma (83.7% vs. 72.3%, p = 0.004), the presence of associated lesions (48.4% vs. 31.5%, p < 0.001), an anterior-predominant fracture pattern and use of a combined surgical approach (both p < 0.001), and a longer time to surgery (8.9 ± 5.4 vs. 7.6 ± 5.3 days, p = 0.011). Conversely, dislocation (22.2% vs. 40.6%, p < 0.001), posterior wall involvement (p = 0.001), and femoral head lesions (p = 0.020) were more frequent in the short operative time group at presentation. On multivariable regression, the presence of associated lesions (OR 1.8, p = 0.02) and high-energy trauma (OR 1.9, p = 0.02) independently predicted long operative time, whereas dislocation was independently associated with shorter operative time (OR 0.5, p = 0.007). Notably, long operative time was not associated with higher rates of infection, heterotopic ossification, femoral head necrosis, post-traumatic osteoarthritis, or conversion to total hip arthroplasty.
conclusionIn acetabular fracture fixation, prolonged operative time was driven primarily by case complexity particularly associated lesions, and trauma type whereas dislocation, typically addressed through a single posterior approach, was associated with shorter operations. Longer operative time did not translate into worse postoperative outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42474779What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.