ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2026
Clinical and molecular features of resected breast cancer brain metastases: a single center retrospective cohort study.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo characterize clinical and molecular characteristics and prognosis among patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who undergo brain metastasis (BM) resection.
methodsWe retrospectively identified patients with MBC who underwent BM resection from 2006 to 2024 at a single center. Chart abstraction was utilized to identify key demographic, treatment, and outcome data. Median real-world overall survival (mrwOS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method; the Cox proportional hazards model evaluated factors associated with mrwOS.
results107 patients were identified with the following MBC subtypes: hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) (n = 26, 24.3%), HER2+ (n = 45, 42.1%), and triple-negative (TNBC; n = 36, 33.6%). At time of initial BM surgical resection, 55 patients (51.4%) had CNS-only disease and 63 patients (58.9%) had a single BM. Most patients received systemic therapy after BM resection (n = 83/95 with available systemic therapy records, 87.4%) and postoperative radiation (n = 92/103 with available post-operative radiation records, 89.3%). Among patients with available BM receptor status (n = 92), 25 (27.2%) had receptor discordance between BM and peripheral tissue testing, mostly loss of BM HR-positivity (n = 20/92, 21.7%). Among patients with available BM NGS testing (n = 40), the most common pathogenic alterations were TP53 mutation (n = 28, 70.0%), ERBB2 amplification (n = 15, 37.5%), and PIK3CA mutation (n = 9, 22.5%); 31 patients (77.5%) had therapeutically targetable mutations. mrwOS from BM resection was longer for patients with HR+/HER2- and HER2+ MBC vs. TNBC (40.3 and 37.8 months vs. 12.6 months, p = 0.04 and p = 0.02 respectively). On multivariate analysis, receipt of systemic therapy (HR 0.09, CI 0.04-0.21, p < 0.01) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (HR 0.41, CI 0.18-0.97, p = 0.04) post-operatively were associated with longer mrwOS. Extracranial disease at time of resection (HR 4.60, CI 2.52-8.39, p < 0.01) and development of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) (HR 6.08, CI 3.00-12.31, p < 0.01) were associated with shorter mrwOS.
conclusionsSurvival after BM resection was ~3 years in patients with HR+/HER2- and HER2+ MBC and ~1 year in patients with TNBC. Extracranial disease at time of BM resection and development of LMD were associated with worse prognosis. Loss of HR-positivity and targetable mutations were present in ~22% and ~75% of resected BMs, respectively, supporting the utility of molecular analysis of resected BMs to guide management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.