ReviewJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2026
Charting the artificial intelligence revolution in orthodontics : A bibliometric analysis of key players, collaborations, and research directions.
Review in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeArtificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming orthodontics, yet a comprehensive and up-to-date bibliometric analysis is lacking. This study systematically maps key research areas, influential contributors, and collaborative networks driving AI innovation.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted in the Web of Science (Clarivate, London, UK) for AI and orthodontics articles up to January 10, 2026. CiteSpace (version 6.2.R6, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA) and VOSviewer (version 1.6.20, Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands) were used to extract and visualize the data, including publications, journals, institutions, countries, highly cited articles, authors, and keywords.
resultsA total of 454 articles were included, authored by 2150 authors affiliated with 674 institutions across 64 countries. The research landscape has expanded exponentially since 2019, with the USA, China, and South Korea emerging as primary global collaboration hubs. Keyword burst analysis highlighted the rapid clinical integration of AI applications in image recognition, diagnosis, and evaluation.
conclusionThis study maps AI integration trends, showing how AI enhances diagnostic precision and treatment evaluation. These insights might be able to guide researchers toward cutting-edge frontiers. Future research should prioritize multimodal data integration, personalized treatment workflows, and patient privacy protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42474723What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.