Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42474682›Full record

ArticleBrain informatics2026

Hybrid self-supervised EEG emotion representation: masked reconstruction joint with mutual information bounds.

Haoyu Liu, Xinyu Li, Haiyan Zhou, Jiajin Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haoyu LiuSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Xinyu LiSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Haiyan ZhouSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Jiajin HuangSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China. jhuang@bjut.edu.cn.

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 4222022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EEG signals are widely used in affective computing and brain informatics for emotion recognition due to their non-invasiveness. Deep learning and self-supervised learning (SSL) are key for EEG representation learning: masked reconstruction captures structural information, while contrastive learning extracts invariant semantic features via maximizing mutual information (MI). However, existing methods lack MI upper-bound constraints, leading to difficulty balancing structural fidelity and semantic discriminability. To address this issue, we propose HybridMI-EEG, a hybrid self-supervised framework for EEG emotion recognition. Built on a Transformer encoder-decoder, it integrates masked reconstruction and MI bound optimization into a three-component synergistic architecture. Specifically, raw EEG signals are decomposed into patch embeddings; a random continuous masking strategy on the embeddings drives reconstruction via contextual information. A dual-objective loss maximizes inter-view consistency and minimizes input-latent redundancy, while learnable augmenters generate informative contrastive views to enable synergistic optimization of local structure and global semantics. Experiments on DEAP and DREAMER datasets show that HybridMI-EEG outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in accuracy and stability, providing an effective solution to enhance EEG representation learning and emotion classification performance.

Indexed as

Contrastive learningEmotion recognitionMutual informationSelf-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID42474682
PMCPMC13391463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.