ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Does technology increase the risk of stiffness after Total Knee Arthroplasty ? Evaluating the role of the learning curve.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arthrofibrosis and stiffness are challenging complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), often treated with Manipulation Under Anesthesia (MUA). Robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) aims to enhance surgical precision, though its impact on stiffness remains unclear. This study examined the association between surgical technologies and MUA rates using propensity score matching (PSM) and assessed whether surgeon experience affects MUA risk. We conducted a retrospective case-control study of 25,611 primary unilateral TKAs (2016-2024), stratified by manual, computer-assisted (CA), or RA techniques. MUA cases within 90 days were matched 1:2 to controls using PSM. Conditional logistic regression assessed the association between surgical technologies and MUA risk. A learning curve analysis of each surgeon's first 100 RA-TKAs assessed surgical proficiency progression. Odds ratios were compared before and after the learning phase to evaluate its impact on MUA rates. Both CA-TKA (OR = 1.11, P = 0.33) and RA-TKA (OR = 1.24, P = 0.12) revealed a higher trend in MUA risk compared to manual. Learning curve analysis of 10 surgeons demonstrated a distinct learning breakpoint at case 11.8 (95% CI 9.2-14.4), after which MUA rates declined and stabilized. The pre-learning phase showed a 5.2% MUA rate, compared with 2.9% post-learning (P = 0.042). Adjusted analyses showed that the learning phase was independently associated with a 2.13-fold increase in MUA risk (95% CI 1.02-4.45, P = 0.043), suggesting that early robotic adoption may contribute to postoperative stiffness risk. Finally, after removing these early cases from the full cohort, RA-TKA showed no increased risk (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.74-1.29), indicating no increased risk once surgeons were beyond the learning phase. Early robotic adoption may contribute to postoperative stiffness risk. Once surgeons progressed beyond the adoption phase, RA-TKA showed similar risk to other techniques, emphasizing the importance of structured training during robotic adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42474645What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.