ArticleCurrent medical science2026
Molecular Alterations in Vaginal Wall Tissues Associated with Post-Hysterectomy Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Article in Current medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveHysterectomy significantly increases the risk of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). However, the underlying molecular changes remain unclear. The aim of this study was to elucidate potential molecular associations by comparing single-cell transcriptomic profiles of vaginal tissues from postmenopausal women across three groups: normal controls, POP patients with an intact uterus, and post-hysterectomy POP patients.
methodsA single-cell transcriptomic dataset of prolapsed vaginal tissues was used to analyze genes that were differentially expressed between fibroblasts and macrophages in the two prolapse types. Key transcriptional regulators of myofibroblast differentiation were identified. Cell subtypes were identified, and macrophage polarization states were assessed to evaluate immune responses in different POP subtypes.
resultsPost-hysterectomy POP patients exhibited impaired myofibroblast differentiation, downregulated expression of wound-healing genes, and disrupted extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. In contrast, uterus-intact POP patients showed stronger immune activation, enhanced fibroblast‒macrophage crosstalk, and upregulated expression of genes related to leukocyte-mediated immunity. Key transcriptional regulators were linked to myofibroblast differentiation. Macrophage profiling revealed predominant M2 polarization in post-hysterectomy patients, indicating a potential compensatory response to biomechanical instability, whereas uterus-intact POP patients maintained more active immune responses.
conclusionThis study revealed that hysterectomy alters vaginal homeostasis through ECM disorganization, impaired wound healing, and macrophage reprogramming. Our findings highlight distinct molecular changes in fibroblasts and macrophages between uterus-intact POP patients and post-hysterectomy POP patients, advancing the understanding of POP pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42474644What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.