Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42474644›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical science2026

Molecular Alterations in Vaginal Wall Tissues Associated with Post-Hysterectomy Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Ya-Qian Li, Yi-Wei Zhang, Yang Ye, Ru-Sha Yin, Jin-Bo-Wen Yan, Shuo Liang, Lan Zhu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ya-Qian Li *Stem Cell Facility, National Infrastructures for Translational Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6032-6032
Yi-Wei Zhang *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Women's Health and Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2661-5034
Yang Ye *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Women's Health and Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6619-4042
Ru-Sha YinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Women's Health and Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Jin-Bo-Wen YanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Women's Health and Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6445-7726
Shuo LiangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Women's Health and Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. leahleung@foxmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9649-7845
Lan ZhuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Women's Health and Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. zhulan@pumch.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5753-5426

Funding

National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2026-PUMCH-A-050Peking Union Medical College Hospital Talent Cultivation Program (Category C) UBJ12052the Independent Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Severe, and Rare Diseases 2025-I-PY-010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHysterectomy significantly increases the risk of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). However, the underlying molecular changes remain unclear. The aim of this study was to elucidate potential molecular associations by comparing single-cell transcriptomic profiles of vaginal tissues from postmenopausal women across three groups: normal controls, POP patients with an intact uterus, and post-hysterectomy POP patients.

methodsA single-cell transcriptomic dataset of prolapsed vaginal tissues was used to analyze genes that were differentially expressed between fibroblasts and macrophages in the two prolapse types. Key transcriptional regulators of myofibroblast differentiation were identified. Cell subtypes were identified, and macrophage polarization states were assessed to evaluate immune responses in different POP subtypes.

resultsPost-hysterectomy POP patients exhibited impaired myofibroblast differentiation, downregulated expression of wound-healing genes, and disrupted extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. In contrast, uterus-intact POP patients showed stronger immune activation, enhanced fibroblast‒macrophage crosstalk, and upregulated expression of genes related to leukocyte-mediated immunity. Key transcriptional regulators were linked to myofibroblast differentiation. Macrophage profiling revealed predominant M2 polarization in post-hysterectomy patients, indicating a potential compensatory response to biomechanical instability, whereas uterus-intact POP patients maintained more active immune responses.

conclusionThis study revealed that hysterectomy alters vaginal homeostasis through ECM disorganization, impaired wound healing, and macrophage reprogramming. Our findings highlight distinct molecular changes in fibroblasts and macrophages between uterus-intact POP patients and post-hysterectomy POP patients, advancing the understanding of POP pathogenesis.

Indexed as

HysterectomyPelvic Organ ProlapseVaginaAgedCell DifferentiationExtracellular MatrixFemaleFibroblastsGene Expression ProfilingHumansMacrophagesMiddle AgedMyofibroblastsTranscriptomeWound HealingExtracellular matrix remodelingHysterectomyMacrophage polarizationMyofibroblast differentiationPelvic organ prolapseSingle-cell transcriptomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.