ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
The future of surgery in space exploration.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-duration human space missions expose astronauts to microgravity, creating unprecedented surgical risks in environments where evacuation is impossible and communication delays limit real-time intervention. Understanding the feasibility and requirements of robot-assisted surgery in space is essential to ensure crew survival and mission continuity. A literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and aerospace medicine databases. Studies on surgical risks in spaceflight, robotic and tele-operated surgical systems, and translational applications were identified and thematically synthesized. Microgravity-induced physiological changes complicate surgical management. Anticipated emergencies include intra-abdominal pathologies, trauma, and craniofacial injuries. Miniaturized robotic systems with tele-mentored and semi-autonomous capabilities demonstrated feasibility in simulated and orbital environments, addressing constraints related to latency, sterility, and limited crew expertise. Translational applications include improved surgical access in remote, military, and low-resource settings on Earth. However, challenges remain in system reliability, training, ethics, and resource constraints. Robotic-assisted surgery represents a mission-critical capability for deep-space exploration and transformation for terrestrial surgical care. Integrated technological, training, and ethical frameworks are required to ensure safe tele-operated surgical interventions in extreme environments, improving global equity in surgical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42474632What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.