Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42474625›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026

Global research trends and hotspots in robot-assisted stereotactic neurosurgery: a bibliometric and visualization analysis (2005-2025).

Lanfang Liu, Chenglou Zhu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lanfang LiuGraduate Training Base, Linyi People's Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Linyi, 276000, China.
Chenglou ZhuCentral Laboratory, Clinical Medical Research Center, Linyi People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Linyi,, 276000, China. zhuchenglou@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study systematically assessed the current state of research on robot-assisted stereotactic neurosurgery, identified major research focuses, and investigated evolving trends in this field, with the intention of providing useful guidance for future scientific studies and clinical practice. In this study, publications related to robot-assisted stereotactic neurosurgery published between 2005 and 2025 were retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded database within the Web of Science Core Collection. Descriptive and visual bibliometric analyses were conducted to evaluate publication characteristics, including research topics, journals, countries or regions, institutions, authors, and citation performance. A total of 194 publications were ultimately included in the analysis. The yearly publication output demonstrated a general upward trend over time, with a particularly noticeable increase observed after 2018. These studies were published in 88 journals, among which Operative Neurosurgery (16 publications), Acta Neurochirurgica (11 publications), and World Neurosurgery (8 publications) were the most productive journals. The most productive countries were the United States (50 publications, 25.8%), China (35 publications, 18.0%), and Germany (23 publications, 11.9%). Keyword analysis showed that recent research hotspots mainly focused on "safety," "efficacy," and "radiosurgery". Robot-assisted stereotactic neurosurgery has shown a steady increase in research activity over the past two decades and has gradually evolved toward more clinically oriented applications. However, bibliometric indicators primarily reflect publication and citation patterns rather than clinical effectiveness. Further studies based on high-quality clinical evidence are required to better evaluate its practical value and long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

BibliometricsNeurosurgeryNeurosurgical ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresStereotaxic TechniquesHumansBibliometric analysisNeurosurgeryRobot-assistedStereotacticVisualization analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.