Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42474619›Full record

ReviewJournal of immigrant and minority health2026

Eligible for Emergency: Emergency Only Hemodialysis for Undocumented Immigrants in the U.S. through an Anthropological Lens.

Yasmine Jedidi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yasmine JedidiDepartment of Public Administration, Doha Institute for Graduate Studies, Doha, Qatar. yje001@dohainstitute.edu.qa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7216-6819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency-only hemodialysis (EoHD) for undocumented immigrants with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in the United States represents a striking contradiction in contemporary health policy. Although ESKD is a chronic and fatal condition that requires regular dialysis to sustain life, many undocumented patients are only granted access to treatment when they deteriorate into a medical emergency. This conceptual commentary examines EoHD as a political and moral arrangement at the intersection of immigration control and public health. The analysis combines Michel Foucault's concepts of biopolitics and governmentality, Achille Mbembe's necropolitics, and Paul Farmer's notion of structural violence. It also engages comparatively with Adriana Petryna's and Julie Livingston's ethnographic works to interpret the impact of bureaucratic thresholds, exclusion, and repeated cycles of crisis on the lived experience of undocumented patients, their families, and the clinicians who care for them. The commentary argues that EoHD functions as a biopolitical mechanism through which the state regulates access to life-sustaining care based on legal status, and concludes that EoHD is a form of structural harm and an indirect tool of migration governance, with consequences that extend far beyond the clinical setting.

Indexed as

BiopoliticsEmergency-only hemodialysisEnd-stage kidney diseaseHealthcare accessNecropoliticsStructural violenceUndocumented immigrants

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.