ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Robotic kidney transplantation with deceased donor grafts: a comparative analysis of outcomes following donation after brain death and donation after circulatory death.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic kidney transplantation (RKT) has demonstrated favorable outcomes in living donor cases. However, evidence on its application using deceased donor grafts (dRKT) remains limited. We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of RKT procedures performed at the University of Colorado Hospital between November 2021 and January 2026. Perioperative, postoperative, and functional outcomes were analyzed, with a sub-analysis comparing normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) and rapid recovery (RR) DCD techniques. A total of 69 dRKTs were performed, with 29 (42.0%) involving donation after brain death (DBD) and 40 (58.0%) from donation after circulatory death (DCD). No conversions to open surgery occurred. Operative parameters, blood loss, and hospital stay were comparable between DBD and DCD groups. Delayed graft function (DGF) occurred in 34.5% of DBD and 47.5% of DCD recipients (p = 0.404), with no significant differences in graft or patient survival. When comparing DCD NRP grafts to DCD RR grafts, the difference in DGF rates was not significant, and NRP and RR grafts had comparable graft and patient survival. Robotic kidney transplantation using deceased donor grafts appears technically feasible in selected DBD and DCD recipients at an experienced transplant center. Although outcome profiles may clinically differ between groups, these results did not meet statistical significance. Among DCD grafts, rates of DGF in NRP and RR cohorts were not statistically significant, a finding that should be considered exploratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42474592What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.