ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
Proctoring as advanced surgical learning: the proctor's perspective in robotic surgery.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic proctoring is often considered a safety and training mechanism for surgeons adopting robotic platforms. While the benefits of proctoring for adopting surgeons have been described across specialties, the educational impact of proctoring on the proctor remains largely unexplored. This Perspective examines robotic proctoring from the proctor's vantage point and argues that proctoring represents a unique professional privilege and a powerful form of advanced surgical learning, offering rare access to the collective experience of surgeons and the accumulated influence of their mentors, institutions, and training traditions. Proctoring enables deliberate observation of diverse operative styles, intraoperative judgment, and system-level factors across institutions, facilitating comparative learning that is difficult to reproduce through personal operative experience alone. Educational theory supports this observation: the protégé effect demonstrates that teaching enhances the teacher's own learning, and the surgical coaching literature increasingly recognizes the bidirectional nature of structured peer-level educational exchange. This Perspective contrasts the largely informal evolution of laparoscopy with the structured implementation of robotics and discusses how centralized training ecosystems and mandated proctoring created an unprecedented opportunity for bidirectional educational exchange. Finally, implications for surgical education, credentialing, and faculty development are outlined, including the practical importance of institutional support, professional flexibility, and fair compensation to sustain proctoring as an enduring source of professional growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42474587What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.