ReviewBioprocess and biosystems engineering2026
Managing complexity in research data management for heterogeneous biotechnological data: a perspective on interacting as data steward.
Review in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biotechnology is an interconnected and globally significant field with expanding impact on industries, bioeconomy and healthcare. The associated rapid increase in data generation requires effective research data management (RDM) that ensures compliance with the FAIR principles (findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable) while addressing challenges related to heterogeneous data formats, metadata complexity, data protection, and governance requirements. Furthermore, archiving and storage of heterogeneous, often proprietary data formats, and subject-specific ontologies in cross-domains can pose challenges for RDM. In a use case involving 50 international, cross-discipline biotechnology researchers, an institutional repository was used for RDM and to manage heterogeneous data formats such as experimental, computer-aided modeling and process engineering data in accordance with the FAIR principles. The RDM built on the repository's existing centralized infrastructure, but this did not entirely meet user expectations for their practical research applications. While centralized top-down infrastructures of repositories provided the technical foundation for FAIR data handling, our observation showed that generic repository frameworks and standardized workflows required continuous, discipline-specific, and human mediated support integrated into everyday research workflows. As intermediaries between institutional requirements and research practice, data stewards can provide valuable insights into the challenges of implementing sustainable RDM helping to optimize repository support structures and align them with researchers' evolving needs in complex real-world biotechnology research environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.