SynthesisArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
Complementary and alternative therapies in the management of menopausal symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Synthesis in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis meta-analysis evaluated the effects of complementary and alternative therapies on menopausal symptoms. MATERIALS AND
methodsRelevant randomized controlled trials published after 2020 were systematically searched in the ASSIA, CENTRAL, CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed, Embase, and WOS databases. A total of 24 studies were included, and analyses were conducted using RevMan and JASP software. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using various statistical methods. Results Twenty-four randomized controlled trials were synthesized. Evidence from the included studies indicates that complementary and traditional interventions may contribute to improvements in menopausal symptoms; however, effect estimates varied substantially across studies. A random-effects meta-analysis identified an average effect estimate, but substantial heterogeneity (τ
conclusionImprovements were most consistent for hot flashes, while evidence for overall symptom severity and quality of life was less consistent. Although no statistically significant publication bias was detected, this finding should be interpreted with caution given the limited number of studies and observed heterogeneity. Integrating evidence-based complementary and alternative approaches into clinical guidelines could enhance holistic women's healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.