ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Distance-dependent modulation of sensory attenuation during motor imagery and overt action.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor imagery is thought to engage forward models that predict the sensory consequences of action, but it remains unclear whether these predictions exhibit the same spatial tuning as those during overt movement. The present study examined how sensory attenuation varies as a function of spatial separation during executed and imagined actions. Twelve participants performed a force-matching task under baseline, pressing, and imagery conditions while the distance between the acting and receiving fingers was manipulated (0, 12.5, 25 cm). Sensory attenuation was quantified as force reproduction error relative to baseline. Results revealed a significant Distance × Condition interaction. Polynomial trend analyses indicated that force reproduction error increased linearly with distance in all conditions, but at different rates: attenuation during overt pressing declined more steeply with distance and was largely absent at 25 cm, whereas attenuation during motor imagery decreased more gradually and was maintained across larger separations. These findings suggest that motor imagery and overt action engage predictive mechanisms with somewhat different spatial characteristics, consistent with the view that forward model precision is influenced by the availability of movement-related sensory feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42474533What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.