Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42474476›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Paternal over- and under-nutrition programme fetal and placental development in a sex-specific manner in mice.

Hannah L Morgan, Nader Eid, Nadine Holmes, Matthew Carlile, Sonal Henson, Fei Sang, Victoria Wright, Marcos Castellanos-Uribe, Iqbal Khan, Nazia Nazar and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Hannah L MorganLifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Nader EidLifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Nadine HolmesDeep Seq, School of Life Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Matthew CarlileDeep Seq, School of Life Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Sonal HensonDeep Seq, School of Life Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Fei SangDeep Seq, School of Life Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Victoria WrightDeep Seq, School of Life Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Marcos Castellanos-UribeNottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (NASC), University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Plant Science Building, School of Biosciences, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Iqbal KhanNottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (NASC), University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Plant Science Building, School of Biosciences, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Nazia NazarNottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (NASC), University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Plant Science Building, School of Biosciences, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Sean T MayNottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (NASC), University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Plant Science Building, School of Biosciences, Loughborough, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5282-3250
Rod T MitchellCentre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4650-3765
Federica LopesSchool of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Robert S RobinsonSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
A Augusto CoppiFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8656-0409
Vipul BatraDivision of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Adam J WatkinsDivision of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0842-1251

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R003556/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/V006711/1United Kingdom Resarch and Innovation Future Leaders Fellowship MR/Y011783/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association between sub-optimal paternal diet and offspring well-being is becoming established. However, the underlying mechanisms are yet to be fully defined. The aim of this study was to establish the impact of over- and under-nutrition, with or without macronutrient supplementation, on male reproductive fitness and post-fertilisation development. Male C57BL/6J mice were fed either control diet (CD), isocaloric low-protein diet (LPD), high-fat/sugar 'Western' diet (WD), or LPD or WD supplemented with methyl donors and carriers (MD-LPD or MD-WD, respectively) for 8 weeks before mating with virgin C57/BL6J females. Placental tissue was collected at embryonic day (E)8.5 to assess early placental (ectoplacental cone) morphology and metabolism and E17.5 for sex-specific transcriptomic profiling. Post-mating, stud male tissues were harvested for the assessment of testicular morphology and gene expression, gut microbiota composition, and metabolic status. WD and MD-WD males displayed increased adiposity, hepatic cholesterol and free fatty acids, and gut microbiota dysbiosis when compared to CD-fed males. In the testes, WD and MD-WD perturbed the expression of genes associated with metabolism and transcription regulation. Additionally, we observed differential expression of multiple genes within the Wnt signalling pathway, central in the regulation of cellular proliferation, migration, survival, and cell fate determination during development. Despite no impact on fundamental male fertility, significant changes in ectoplacental cone metabolism, fetal growth, and placental gene expression were observed in response to specific dietary regimens. Interestingly, while CD male and female placentas displayed 301 genome-wide, sexually dimorphic genes, LPD, MD-LPD, WD, and MD-WD male and female placentas possessed only 13, 0, 14, and 15 sexually dimorphic genes, respectively. Our data show that while sub-optimal paternal diet has minimal impact on male fertility, fetal and placental development are perturbed in a sex-specific manner.

Indexed as

DietFetal DevelopmentPlacentationAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPlacentaPregnancydevelopmental biologyfetal programmingmetabolic disordermousepaternal dietplacental developmentsexual dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID42474476
PMCPMC13384496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.