Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42474433›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Predictive processing in visual perception of actions: The modulation of short-term priors by the long-term prior.

Gizem Özen, Burcu A Urgen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gizem ÖzenDepartment of Cognitive Science, Informatics Institute, Middle East Technical University, Universiteler Mahallesi, Cankaya, Ankara, Türkiye.
Burcu A UrgenAysel Sabuncu Brain Research Center and National Magnetic Resonance Research Center (UMRAM), Bilkent University, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive processing theories suggest that perception is shaped by prior knowledge, with long-term priors formed through lifelong experiences and short-term priors emerging from immediate contextual cues. Although prior research has explored the influence of expectations on action perception, the interaction between short-term and long-term priors remains understudied. This study examines how these priors interact in visual action perception by embedding animated human and robot agents within a probabilistic-cueing paradigm. Participants observed agents performing biological or mechanical motion, with cues providing either form-based or motion-based short-term priors. Behavioral results showed that long-term priors guided perceptual decisions across conditions when the target stimuli were congruent with them. When expectations were violated, performance patterns reflected a greater weighting of motion-based short-term cues, while form-based cues contributed minimally. These findings highlight the hierarchical nature of predictive processing in action perception, and the precision assigned to different priors is adjusted according to context, favoring motion-based information instead of form-based when resolving perceptual ambiguity.

Indexed as

CuesMotion PerceptionPsychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42474433
PMCPMC13398876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.