ArticleeLife2026
Neural categorization of visual words of alphabetic and non-alphabetic languages.
Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Languages provide social-category markers that tag people as one or another social group. How does the brain sort words into different language categories as a basis of the social-categorization function of language? The current work addressed this issue by testing neural categorization of visual words of different writing systems in nine studies using electroencephalography, magnetoencephalography, and a repetition suppression paradigm. This work showed that a neural network, including the anterior temporal, insular, orbital frontal, and ventral occipito-temporal cortices in both hemispheres, was engaged in computations of correlation distances between two words to represent intra-language similarity and inter-language difference during categorization of visual words of alphabetic and non-alphabetic languages. These processes occurred as early as 150 ms post-stimulus, recruited within-hemisphere functional connections, operated independently of words' semantic meanings and pronunciations, and exhibited consistently across individuals with diverse language backgrounds. These findings highlight the neural mechanisms of language-based spontaneous neural categorization of visual words as a basis of the social-categorization function of language.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.