Trial reportClinical pharmacology in drug development2026
Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Tamsulosin Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsules in Healthy Chinese Volunteers: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.
Trial report in Clinical pharmacology in drug development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tamsulosin hydrochloride is a long-acting, highly selective α1A receptor antagonist, primarily used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia. It effectively alleviates lower urinary tract symptoms, including dysuria, nocturia, and urgency caused by prostate enlargement. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of two tamsulosin extended-release capsules in Chinese volunteers under both fasting and fed conditions. A single-center, randomized, open-label, two-formulation, single-dose, two-period, two-way crossover design was used. A total of 64 healthy volunteers were enrolled, with 28 in the fasting group and 36 in the fed group. In the fasting group, each subject received a single dose of either the test or reference formulation in a randomized crossover design. In the fed group, volunteers consumed a high-fat meal 1 h before dosing. Blood samples were collected for up to 72 h post-dose, and plasma tamsulosin concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for key exposure metrics for both formulations under fasting and fed conditions were within the 0.8000-1.2500 bioequivalence range. Both formulations demonstrated bioequivalence under both conditions, and no severe adverse events were observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.