Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42473947›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2026

PETIMOT: a novel framework for inferring protein motions from sparse data using SE(3)-equivariant graph neural networks.

Valentin Lombard, Julien Nguyen Van, Sergei Grudinin, Elodie Laine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valentin LombardDepartment of Computational, Quantitative, and Synthetic Biology (CQSB), UMR 7238 IBPS, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France.
Julien Nguyen VanDepartment of Computational, Quantitative, and Synthetic Biology (CQSB), UMR 7238 IBPS, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France.
Sergei GrudininUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LJK, 38000 Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1903-7220
Elodie LaineDepartment of Computational, Quantitative, and Synthetic Biology (CQSB), UMR 7238 IBPS, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4870-6304

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 101087830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins move and deform to ensure their biological functions. Despite significant progress in protein structure prediction, approximating conformational ensembles under physiological conditions remains a fundamental open problem. This paper presents a novel perspective on the problem by directly targeting continuous compact representations of protein motions inferred from sparse experimental observations. We develop a task-specific loss function enforcing data symmetries, including scaling and permutation operations. Our method PETIMOT (Protein sEquence and sTructure-based Inference of MOTions) leverages transfer learning from pre-trained protein language models through an SE(3)-equivariant graph neural network. When trained and evaluated on the Protein Data Bank, PETIMOT shows superior performance in time and accuracy, capturing protein dynamics, particularly large/slow conformational changes, compared with state-of-the-art diffusion and flow-matching approaches, as well as traditional physics-based models. Our code and protocols are available at https://github.com/PhyloSofS-Team/PETIMOT.

Indexed as

ProteinsSoftwareDatabases, ProteinGraph Neural NetworksModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProteinsmotion benchmarkpredicting linear subspacesprotein flexibilitySE(3)-equivariant GNNstructural bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID42473947
PMCPMC13431647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.