ArticleNanomedicine (London, England)2026
Longitudinally cultured precision cut lung slices as a predictive
Article in Nanomedicine (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimExploring alternatives to MATERIAL AND
methodsUsing Paclitaxel as a benchmark drug and a therapeutically promising silver nanoparticles in combination with immunotherapy, we conducted a pioneering comparative analysis of its therapeutic effects on PCLS against traditional in vivo models.
resultsRevealed that PCLS closely mimics
conclusionThis direct comparison not only confirms the utility of PCLS in simulating real-world outcomes but also emphasizes its potential in reducing animal testing. By providing a reliable, ethical, and efficient alternative for lung cancer studies, PCLS could significantly enhance preclinical research and drug development, marking a critical step toward more humane and representative scientific investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.