ArticleBiology open2026
Prey capture strategies relate to prey position in the scale-eating cichlid Perissodus microlepis.
Article in Biology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predators have evolved sophisticated behavioral patterns that enable efficient prey capture. The scale-eating cichlid Perissodus microlepis exhibits pronounced morphological asymmetry in mouth-opening direction, corresponding to behavioral laterality in attack direction. Given that recognizing and tracking the flank of prey are crucial for successful predation, we hypothesized that the morphological asymmetry also influences their spatial positioning relative to prey during attack initiation. To test this idea, we simultaneously tracked predator and prey movements using DeepLabCut and analyzed the predatory sequence. Not only strike direction but also the lateralized approach initiation position was correlated with mouth asymmetry. Additionally, trajectory analyses revealed two distinct predation strategies based on the predator's relative position to the prey at the start of the approach: a rear approach, whereby predators move in from behind and strike at close range with strong body flexion, and a side approach, whereby predators initiate from lateral positions at shorter distances and rush forward. Although rear and side attacks differ in their kinematics and strike timing, both strategies achieve high predation success by applying strong forces to the prey's flank. Overall, this study advances our understanding of the predation strategies of scale-eating cichlids, providing insights into their evolutionary significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.