Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42473764›Full record

ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2026

On Determination of Force on Bead-Surface Linker Proteins-Comment on a Recent Paper on Small.

Rasool Dezhkam, Cheng Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rasool DezhkamGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2586-0539
Cheng ZhuGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1718-565X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a 2023 Small paper, the authors introduced a microfluidics-based high-throughput force spectroscopy assay to probe protein mechanics by measuring bead displacement under shear flow. Their analysis, however, appears to contain three issues that may have affected the accuracy of the results: (1) setting up the basic force balance equations incorrectly, (2) not considering the torque exerted on the bead by the hydrodynamic forces and not balancing the moments, and (3) assuming the linker anchoring the bead aligns with the bead's radius. Here, we demonstrate that these mistakes lead to erroneous force estimations on the bond. Using established formulations from Goldman, Tissot, Pierres, and others, we present the correct governing equations that balance both forces and moments. Applying this corrected model to the authors' data shows that the forces experienced by single, double, and triple Biotin-NeutrAvidin bonds are 3.17-, 5.54-, and 29.30-fold greater, respectively, than those reported by the authors, while the calculated bond lengths remain consistent. These findings highlight the importance of correctly setting up the basic force balance and incorporating torque in the moment balance in the calculation of force in the microfluidics-based force spectroscopy.

Indexed as

ProteinsMicrofluidicsSurface PropertiesProteinsbead–surface tethered proteinsforce spectroscopymicrofluidicsshear force

Identifiers

PMID42473764
PMCPMC13472305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.