ArticleiScience2026
Exploring near-optimal energy systems with stakeholders: A novel approach for participatory modeling.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Including local populations in energy transition planning can increase its legitimacy, socio-political feasibility, and, in turn, climate mitigation efficacy. Comprehensive stakeholder involvement in participatory modeling facilitates learning; however, the choice of options and scenarios in the model can be opaque to participants. Here, we present a framework in which stakeholders engage with near-optimal modeling results holistically and showcase our methodology in a case study of the remote Arctic settlement of Longyearbyen, Svalbard. Participants choose across a continuum of modeling-based energy system designs in an interactive interface through which they select essentially any feasible combination of system components and immediately see the implications of their choice. With Longyearbyen already affected by climate change, stakeholders consistently deviate from the cost optimum and instead balance different aspects like emissions, costs, and system vulnerability. When confronted with difficult trade-offs, participants feel better informed through our tool and successfully navigate through complex and intertwined decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.