Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42473666›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Exploring near-optimal energy systems with stakeholders: A novel approach for participatory modeling.

Oskar Vågerö, Koen van Greevenbroek, Aleksander Grochowicz, Maximilian Roithner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oskar VågeröDepartment of Technology Systems, University of Oslo, Kjeller, Norway.
Koen van GreevenbroekDepartment of Computer Science, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Aleksander GrochowiczDepartment of Mathematics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Maximilian RoithnerDepartment of Technology Systems, University of Oslo, Kjeller, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Including local populations in energy transition planning can increase its legitimacy, socio-political feasibility, and, in turn, climate mitigation efficacy. Comprehensive stakeholder involvement in participatory modeling facilitates learning; however, the choice of options and scenarios in the model can be opaque to participants. Here, we present a framework in which stakeholders engage with near-optimal modeling results holistically and showcase our methodology in a case study of the remote Arctic settlement of Longyearbyen, Svalbard. Participants choose across a continuum of modeling-based energy system designs in an interactive interface through which they select essentially any feasible combination of system components and immediately see the implications of their choice. With Longyearbyen already affected by climate change, stakeholders consistently deviate from the cost optimum and instead balance different aspects like emissions, costs, and system vulnerability. When confronted with difficult trade-offs, participants feel better informed through our tool and successfully navigate through complex and intertwined decision-making.

Indexed as

Energy systems modelingEnergy systems planningModeling-to-generate alternativesNear-optimalParticipationStakeholder involvement

Identifiers

PMID42473666
PMCPMC13380767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.