ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Artificial Intelligence in the Nutritional Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diet is closely associated with the onset, progression, and prognosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In the absence of specific dietary and nutritional guidelines, nutritional management for IBD patients is fraught with challenges and uncertainties. Existing research indicates that artificial intelligence (AI) has great potential for application in the nutritional management of patients with chronic diseases; however, current research on its use in IBD patients is limited. Methods: This scoping review was reported in strict accordance with the PRISMA-ScR checklist. A systematic search was conducted across 11 databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, covering the period from the inception of each database to February 2026, focusing on studies investigating the application of AI in the nutritional management of IBD patients. Results: Of the 4,560 records initially screened, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. The results indicate that AI applications primarily focus on: dietary pattern recognition, such as using clustering algorithms to identify an association between plant-based diets and lower inflammation risk; treatment response prediction, with machine learning models predicting the success rate of total parenteral nutrition and achieving 90% accuracy in distinguishing between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis; personalized information support, where conversational AI such as ChatGPT answered nutritional questions with 83.0% accuracy, and smartphone apps can influence patients' dietary behaviors; identifying patient needs, where Natural Language Processing and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling identified key patient concerns such as treatment experiences, dietary advice, and psychological burden. Key technologies encompass traditional machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, and multi-omics integrated analysis. AI applications have preliminarily demonstrated the ability to reduce inflammatory markers and improve gut microbiota; fecal metabolites have been confirmed as reliable indicators of disease. Conclusion: AI holds promise for the nutritional management of IBD and has shown preliminary success in pattern recognition, prediction of treatment efficacy, and patient empowerment. However, existing studies are often limited by small sample sizes and insufficient generalizability, and the evidence remains preliminary and heterogeneous. Future efforts should focus on large-scale studies and multidisciplinary collaboration to advance AI from proof-of-concept to clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.