ReviewJournal of pain research2026
The Effectiveness of Child Life Services in Reducing Pediatric Procedural Pain: A Systematic Review and Three-Level Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the effectiveness of Child Life Services (CLS) in reducing procedural pain among pediatric patients. Patients and Methods: A registered systematic review and three-level meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Six databases were searched from inception to 2 June 2025. Eligible studies included RCTs comparing CLS with standard care in children aged 0-18 years undergoing medical procedures. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 for RCTs and ROBINS-I for quasi-experimental studies. Pooled standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) were estimated using three-level random-effects model. Four categorical moderators were examined: measurement timing, age group, procedure type, and assessor type. Results: Twelve studies (N = 1,366) were included. CLS significantly reduced procedural pain compared with standard care (g = -0.72, 95% CI [-1.19, -0.24], p =0.007). Heterogeneity was primarily attributable to between-study differences (Level 3 I Conclusion: CLS demonstrates a significant effect in alleviating procedural pain in children. Self-reported pain outcomes show better effects than observer-rated outcomes. While the benefits appear particularly pronounced among younger children and one-time injections, the evidence for older children and surgical contexts warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.