Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42473600›Full record

ReviewStructural heart : the journal of the Heart Team2026

Axial Flow Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices: Physiology, Procedural Considerations, and Clinical Applications-A State-of-the-Art Review.

Ovidio De Filippo, Ilaria Pagliassotto, Valentina Braia, Riccardo Improta, Gianluca Di Pietro, Pierre Meynet, Martina Pecoraro, Maria Luisa Carbone, Marco Nebiolo, Francesco Bruno and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Contemporary evidence in protected percutaneous coronary intervention: a case-based review.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ovidio De FilippoDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Ilaria PagliassottoDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Valentina BraiaDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Riccardo ImprotaDepartment of Clinical, Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Umberto I Hospital, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Gianluca Di PietroDepartment of Clinical, Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Umberto I Hospital, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Pierre MeynetDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Martina PecoraroDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Maria Luisa CarboneDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Marco NebioloDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Francesco BrunoDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Federico GiacobbeDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Gaetano Maria De FerrariDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Antonio LoforteDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Wojciech WańhaDepartment Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Mauro RinaldiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Fabrizio D'AscenzoDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Roberto LorussoCardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Maastricht University Medical Center+ and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous microaxial flow pumps have become an important form of temporary mechanical circulatory support for patients with advanced cardiac dysfunction, particularly in cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. By actively unloading the ventricle, reducing end-diastolic pressure and myocardial oxygen demand, and supporting systemic and coronary perfusion, Impella devices offer distinct physiological advantages over passive support strategies. This state-of-the-art review summarizes the mechanisms of ventricular unloading, device characteristics, procedural considerations, monitoring requirements, complication management, and contemporary clinical applications of axial-flow percutaneous ventricular assist devices. Current evidence suggests that, in selected patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock, early and protocolized Impella use may improve survival, although this benefit must be balanced against higher rates of bleeding, hemolysis, vascular injury, thrombosis, and device-related complications. In high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, Impella may enhance procedural stability and facilitate more complete revascularization, but a definitive survival benefit remains unproven. Emerging applications include right ventricular support, biventricular support, postcardiotomy shock prevention, ventricular tachycardia ablation, and combined use with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Despite expanding use, major uncertainties remain regarding optimal timing, patient selection, standardized anticoagulation and weaning protocols, cost-effectiveness, and generalizability beyond infarct-related shock. Further randomized trials, registry-based analyses, and technological refinements are needed to define which patients benefit most while minimizing complications.

Indexed as

Cardiogenic shock (CS)high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)Narrative reviewPercutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS)Percutaneous microaxial flow plumps (pMFP)

Identifiers

PMID42473600
PMCPMC13380731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.