Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42473568›Full record

ArticleJournal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering

Viability of 3D printing for load-bearing wheelchair components: A progressive anti-tipper prototype.

Sayed Naseel Mohamed Thangal, James Formby, Torr Brown, Jaimie Borisoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sayed Naseel Mohamed ThangalMAKE+, Applied Research, BCIT.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2690-2742
James FormbyPDG Mobility, Permobil Group.
Torr BrownPDG Mobility, Permobil Group.
Jaimie BorisoffMAKE+, Applied Research, BCIT.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9672-8367

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Customized wheelchair components that are designed to fit the individual user and consider their preferences can greatly improve the user's quality of life, but are often cost-prohibitive using traditional manufacturing methods. 3D printing technology is advancing rapidly and has been used to manufacture assistive devices, but there is limited research on whether these methods are viable for load-bearing structural components in wheelchairs. We designed a progressive anti-tipper, an anti-tipper that provides a spring-loaded response to backwards rotation of the wheelchair. This prototype avoids the hard impact of rigid anti-tippers, and also provides increased range of motion of up to 20° rearward tip, allowing the front casters to rise far enough to climb curbs. We 3D printed our prototype using four different 3D printing methods in five materials (PLA, ASA, Resin, Onyx (Nylon+carbon fiber composite), and stainless steel). We performed function tests, ISO 7176-8 strength tests, and UTM destructive tests. The Onyx and stainless steel 3D prints passed our function and strength requirements, indicating that 3D printed parts show potential for load bearing components in wheelchairs. Further fatigue, strength, and real-world use studies are warranted to explore the viability of this technology.

Indexed as

3D printingadditive manufacturinganti-tipperassistive technologyISO 7176stabilitystrengthwheelchair

Identifiers

PMID42473568
PMCPMC13380676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.