ArticleCureus2026
Validation of Endometriosis Fertility Index for the Prediction of Non-Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Pregnancy in Women With Endometriosis-Associated Infertility: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Endometriosis is a common cause of infertility and affects reproductive outcomes through multiple mechanisms, including pelvic adhesions, altered pelvic anatomy, and inflammatory changes. The Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI) was developed as a prognostic tool to predict spontaneous conception after the surgical treatment of endometriosis. This study aimed to validate the EFI for predicting non-assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy outcomes after laparoscopic surgery in women with endometriosis-associated infertility and compare its predictive performance with the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine (r-ASRM) classification. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, between January 2016 and December 2017 with a six-month postoperative follow-up. Seventy-two women with endometriosis-associated infertility confirmed during operative laparoscopy were included. EFI scores were calculated postoperatively using historical parameters (age, the duration of infertility, and prior pregnancy) and surgical parameters (Least Function Score {LFS} and ASRM score). Patients underwent individualized fertility management, including expectant management, ovulation induction, and intrauterine insemination (IUI) where indicated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed to assess predictive accuracy. Results The mean EFI score was 6.7 ± 1.6. Women who achieved clinical pregnancy had significantly higher EFI scores than those who did not conceive (8.2 ± 1.2 versus 6.0 ± 1.3; p < 0.001). An EFI cut-off of ≥7 predicted clinical pregnancy with a sensitivity of 95.8% and specificity of 52.3%, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.82-0.97). The hazard ratio for conception among women with an EFI of ≥7 was 19.2 (95% CI: 2.6-142.1; p = 0.004). Women with EFI scores of 9-10 demonstrated a 100% pregnancy rate within six months. The cumulative probability of non-ART pregnancy at six months was 33.3%. An ASRM score of <21 also demonstrated predictive capability with an AUC of 0.92. Conclusion EFI demonstrated strong predictive performance for non-ART pregnancy outcomes following laparoscopic surgery in women with endometriosis-associated infertility. The index may serve as a valuable clinical tool for individualized fertility counselling, prognostic assessment, and guiding decisions regarding expectant management versus early assisted reproductive intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.