ArticleCureus2026
Comparative Angiogenic Potential of Collagen and Polytetrafluoroethylene Guided Tissue Regeneration Membranes: An Experimental Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane Assay Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Angiogenesis is an important biological event in periodontal regeneration, as early vascular support is necessary for oxygen delivery, nutrient transport, and tissue healing. Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) membranes may influence this vascular response depending on their material properties. Aim To compare the angiogenic response of resorbable collagen and non-resorbable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) GTR membranes using the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay. Materials and methods Thirty fertilized chicken eggs were divided equally into three groups: control, collagen membrane, and PTFE membrane. On Day 3 of incubation, the respective membranes were placed onto the CAM surface, while no membrane was placed in the control group. On Day 7, macroscopic images were obtained and analyzed using Wimasis Image Analysis software (Wimasis, Onimagin Technologies SCA, Córdoba, Spain). Vessel density, total vessel network length, and branching points were compared using Welch analysis of variance and Games-Howell post hoc test. Results PTFE showed significantly higher vessel density, total vessel network length, and branching points than both the control and collagen groups (p < 0.001). The collagen group showed significantly higher branching points than the control group, but vessel density and total vessel network length were not significantly different between these two groups. Conclusion PTFE demonstrated a stronger angiogenic response than collagen in the CAM model. These findings suggest material-dependent differences in early vascular response, but further histological, animal, and clinical studies are required before clinical conclusions can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.