ArticleCureus2026
Thoracoscopic Versus Open Repair of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Retrospective Case Series From a Tertiary Care Center.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) remains a challenging neonatal surgical condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Thoracoscopic repair has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional open repair in selected patients.
aimThe aim of this study is to share our experience in the surgical management of CDH and to compare postoperative outcomes between thoracoscopic repair and open laparotomy. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis of six patients with CDH managed surgically at a tertiary care center was performed. Demographic data, antenatal diagnosis, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), surgical approach, ventilator requirement, initiation of enteral feeding, duration of analgesia, hospital stay, and follow-up outcomes were evaluated.
resultsAll patients had left-sided Bochdalek hernias. Three patients underwent thoracoscopic repair, and three underwent open laparotomy. Thoracoscopic repair was associated with a reduced ventilator requirement, earlier initiation of enteral feeds, shorter duration of intravenous analgesia, and reduced hospital stay. One mortality occurred in the laparotomy group. No patient required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or patch repair. Conclusion: Thoracoscopic repair of CDH, when performed in carefully selected patients, is safe and associated with improved short-term postoperative outcomes compared to open repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.