Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42473489›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Clinical Outcomes Following Repair of Acute Patellar Tendon Injuries at a Tertiary Trauma Centre: A 16-Year Retrospective Series.

Osasenaga Bencharles, Neil Ashwood, Mohammed Khatir, Akhshay George, James Heath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Osasenaga BencharlesTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Burton, GBR.
Neil AshwoodTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Burton, GBR.
Mohammed KhatirTrauma and Orthopaedics, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Kent, GBR.
Akhshay GeorgeTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Burton, GBR.
James HeathTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Patellar tendon rupture is an uncommon but functionally debilitating injury requiring prompt surgical repair to restore the knee extensor mechanism. Evidence regarding the effect of short in-hospital delays to surgery on postoperative outcomes remains limited. This study evaluated short-term clinical outcomes following acute patellar tendon repair at a tertiary trauma centre over a 16-year period. Methods A retrospective case series was conducted using a prospectively maintained trauma registry from a tertiary hospital in the East Midlands, United Kingdom (2008-2024). Clinical records, operative notes, and follow-up documentation were reviewed. Data collected included patient demographics, injury characteristics, imaging modality, repair technique, surgeon grade, time to surgery (TTS), postoperative range of motion (ROM), follow-up duration, and complications. The primary outcome was postoperative knee flexion ROM at discharge. Statistical analysis included Pearson correlation and Spearman's correlation for non-parametric analysis, independent-samples t-tests, and one-way ANOVA. Results Thirty-four patients underwent operative repair of acute patellar tendon rupture. The cohort had a male-to-female ratio of 7.5:1, with a mean age of 50.7 years. Mean TTS was 2.5 days, and mean postoperative ROM at discharge was 105.4°. All patients with documented range-of-motion data achieved at least 85° of knee flexion, recorded at the final outpatient review. Complications occurred in nine (26.5%) patients, although most were minor and managed non-operatively. There was no significant association between TTS and postoperative ROM at discharge (r = -0.11, p = 0.59), suggesting that short in-hospital delays within the observed acute treatment window were not statistically associated with ROM at discharge. No statistically significant differences in short-term outcomes were observed between consultant-led and supervised registrar-led procedures, although this comparison was exploratory and unadjusted. Additional preoperative imaging was not associated with a statistically significant increase in TTS. Conclusion Primary repair of acute patellar tendon rupture produced satisfactory short-term functional outcomes with a low rate of major complications. Within the observed acute treatment window (0-9 days), no association was identified between time to surgery and knee flexion ROM at discharge, although the study was underpowered to exclude small-to-moderate effects. Supervised trainee-led surgery was associated with short-term outcomes similar to those of consultant-led procedures, although case allocation was not randomised. These findings are exploratory and confined to short-term outcomes. Larger prospective studies incorporating validated patient-reported outcome measures are required to better define prognostic factors following acute patellar tendon repair.

Indexed as

anchor suture repairavulsion fractureknee extensor mechanismknee traumapatella tendon rupture

Identifiers

PMID42473489
PMCPMC13380828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.