Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42473479›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

A Global and Local SHAP-Driven Interpretable Framework for Early Hospital Admission Prediction With Machine Learning at Emergency Department Triage.

Adam E Brown, Chance W Marostica, Nicole R Hodgson, Wayne A Martini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam E BrownEmergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Phoenix, USA.
Chance W MarosticaEmergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Phoenix, USA.
Nicole R HodgsonEmergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, USA.
Wayne A MartiniEmergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency department (ED) crowding and constrained hospital resources drive the need for early risk stratification to efficiently identify patients requiring inpatient admission or escalation of care. Machine learning (ML) models are promising as helpful tools for admission prediction, yet there remains limited literature exploring the integration of explainability techniques to enhance the transparency of these models for clinicians and resource allocation staff end-users. Explainability, in this context, refers to techniques that show which patient features contributed most to each individual prediction and to the model's overall behavior.

objectivesTo develop ML models predicting hospital admission at ED triage and to demonstrate population-level and individual-level explainability as a step toward building trust and fair evaluation of AI-assisted triage models.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of ED visits (2020-2024) across three tertiary-care EDs. We extracted structured triage data, including patient demographics, vital signs, Emergency Severity Index (ESI), arrival mode, and comorbidities from the electronic medical record. Six models were developed and evaluated on a temporally distinct holdout test set. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied to the two top-performing models (CatBoost and XGBoost) on a population and individual prediction level.

resultsThe training cohort included 620,729 visits (32.4% admitted); the test cohort included 183,789 visits (32.3% admitted). CatBoost achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.870 (F1 0.701; sensitivity 79.0%; specificity 78.0%). XGBoost achieved an AUC of 0.848. ESI level, vital signs, means of arrival, and presenting complaints were among the most influential predictors. Post-hoc Platt scaling reduced the Brier score from 0.146 to 0.134 and corrected a systematic over-prediction of admission probability (calibration intercept moved from -0.69 to 0.02).

conclusionsML models using triage data predict hospital admission with good discrimination. Population-level and individual-level SHAP provide transparency that may facilitate clinician trust and fair model evaluation.

Indexed as

catboostemergency departmentexplainable artificial intelligence (xai)hospital admissioninterpretable machine learningshaptriagexgboost

Identifiers

PMID42473479
PMCPMC13380983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.