ArticleAmerican journal of botany2026
Extroparvum occidentale gen. et sp. nov. and the Cretaceous diversification of Lauraceae.
Article in American journal of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
premiseThe fossil record of Lauraceae extends back to the Early Cretaceous and comprises numerous flowers. However, phylogenetic relationships of many of these fossil flowers remain unresolved. To better understand the early evolutionary history of Lauraceae, we conducted phylogenetic analyses of living and extinct members of the family and described a new fossil flower from the Coniacian of British Columbia, Canada.
methodsSerial sections of the new fossil flower were prepared and used to create a three-dimensional reconstruction. We performed a series of phylogenetic analyses, including total-evidence analyses using a novel morphological matrix, to analyze the new fossil flower and 16 previously described fossil flowers. Phylogenetic uncertainty was explored for each taxon, and phylogenetic pseudofossilization analyses were conducted to test whether our floral data set can accurately recover systematic relationships within Lauraceae.
resultsThe Eden Main fossil flowers are assignable to Lauraceae and represent a new genus and species: Extroparvum occidentale. Phylogenetic analyses recovered E. occidentale and 12 fossil flowers among Lauraceae. Phylogenetic uncertainty within Lauraceae was high for many of the fossils, but we identified two taxa as crown-group members that can be employed as new node calibrations for the family. Pseudofossilization analyses indicated that our floral data set can accurately recover taxa within crown-group Lauraceae with high support.
conclusionsOur work adds to the known Cretaceous diversity of Lauraceae and provides the first phylogenetic evidence of crown-group Lauraceae diversifying by the Late Cretaceous. Furthermore, our novel morphological data set lays an important foundation for directly integrating fossil flowers into macroevolutionary studies of the family.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.