ArticleMedical education2026
Living between stereotype and erasure: A study of the model minority myth in medical education.
Article in Medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Living between stereotype and erasure: A study of the model minority myth in medical education.Medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAsian sub-ethnic trainees and physician educators constitute a substantial proportion of the medical workforce across Western countries yet remain systematically excluded from diversity and inclusion discourse. The model minority myth (MMM)-the construct that positions Asians as uniformly high-achieving, non-confrontational and culturally assimilated-operates as a structural force that simultaneously confers partial privilege and constrains identity, advancement and help-seeking. Despite its harms, the mechanisms by which the MMM operates across medical training remain understudied.
methodsFourteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with Asian sub-ethnic medical students, residents and physician educators across medical training institutions. A hermeneutic phenomenological approach was used, guided by an Asian Critical Theory (AsianCrit) framework. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using deductive and inductive thematic analysis to ensure rigour.
resultsSix themes were identified: (1) internalised exceptionalism and family-mediated career pressure; (2) everyday racial misrecognition and erasure, including name mispronunciation and physical interchangeability; (3) structural barriers to leadership, including the bamboo ceiling, voluntold labour and social exclusion; (4) homogenisation and the use of the MMM as a wedge against Black and Indigenous peers; (5) performative equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) initiatives, curriculum gaps and tokenistic institutional participation; and (6) mentorship patterns shaped by shared ethnic and cultural experience. Cross-cutting findings included the MMM's suppression of help-seeking, the differential operation of the myth across Arab/Middle Eastern sub-ethnic identities and the influence of geopolitical events on identity expression.
conclusionsThe MMM shapes lived experience across the full arc of medical training, from admissions through senior leadership. Its harms are not uniform: They vary by sub-ethnic group, generation, gender and institutional context. Medical education must move beyond performative EDI to structurally address the MMM's manifestations in curriculum, selection processes and mentorship. Disaggregating 'Asian' into its constituent sub-ethnic identities is essential to equitable policy and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.