Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42473098›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026

Chalcogen Impurity Barriers in 2D Systems via Semi-Empirical/Machine Learning Modeling: A Survey of 4000 Materials.

M L Pereira, M G E da Luz, P Cesana, A L da Rosa, M J Piotrowski, D Guedes-Sobrinho, T A S Pereira, E A Moujaes, A C Dias, R M Tromer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M L PereiraCollege of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasília70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9058-510X
M G E da LuzDepartamento de Física & Multidisciplinary Laboratory for Modeling and Analysis of Data in Complex Systems (MADComplex), Núcleo de Modelagem e Computação Científica-Centro Interdisciplinar de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação, Universidade Federal do Paraná, 81531-980Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3865-2621
P CesanaInstitute of Mathematics for Industry, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Fukuoka819-0395, Japan.
A L da RosaInstitute of Physics, Federal University of Goiás, Campus Samambaia, 74690-900Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2780-6448
M J PiotrowskiDepartment of Physics, Federal University of Pelotas, P.O. Box 354, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul96010-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3477-4437
D Guedes-SobrinhoChemistry Department, Federal University of Paraná, CEP 81531─980, 81531-980Curitiba, Brazil.
T A S PereiraPhysics Graduate Program, Institute of Physics, Federal University of Mato Grosso, 78060-900Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7968-9194
E A MoujaesInstitute of Physics, Federal University of Bahia, Campus Ondina, 40170-115Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
A C DiasInstitute of Physics and International Center of Physics, University of Brasília, Distrito Federal, 70919-970Brasília, Brazil.
R M TromerInstitute of Physics, University of Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasília70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6180-5641

Funding

Bundesministerium f?r Bildung und Forschung 13XP5094AConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico 04577/2021-0Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico 303206/2025-0Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico 305174/20231Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico 305335/2020-0Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico 307371/2025-5Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico 307512/2023-1Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico 309599/2021-0Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico 313081/2017-4Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico 315324/2023-6Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico 371610/2023-0Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico 409174/2024-6Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico 409792/2024-1Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico 444069/2024-0Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico 444431/2024-1Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico 444921/2024-9Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior 00193-00000867/2024-94Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior 88881.188740/2025Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior 88881.311780/2018-00Funda??o de Amparo ? i Pesquisa?do Estado de?Mato Grosso PRO-2025/00376Funda??o de Amparo ? i Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul 24/25510001551-5Funda??o de Apoio ? i Pesquisa do Distrito Federal 0019300000867/202494Funda??o de Apoio ? i Pesquisa do Distrito Federal 00193-00001807/2023-16Funda??o de Apoio ? i Pesquisa do Distrito Federal 0019300001817/202343Funda??o de Apoio ? i Pesquisa do Distrito Federal 0019300002073/202384Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP24K06797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adequate characterization of two-dimensional (2D) materials with low energy barriers for impurity adsorption is key for advancing applications based on catalysis, sensing, and surface functionalization. However, first-principles methods, such as density functional theory, are often computationally extremely expensive for feasible large-scale screenings. Given such a scenario, we address a data-driven approach, which integrates the semiempirical extended Hückel method (EHM) with machine learning (ML) techniques to estimate adsorption energy barriers in the case of three relevant chalcogen impurities, sulfur (S), selenium (Se), and tellurium (Te). With this aim, we consider the 4036 2D materials found in the Computational 2D Materials Database (C2DB). The scheme employs the EHM to compute energy profiles along three in-plane migration paths, from which average barriers can be derived. The equilibrium distance between the impurity and the 2D surface is not calculated from a time-consuming geometry optimization. Instead, it is estimated from a simple effective phenomenological expression. Physicochemical descriptors are then obtained from the Matminer (Materials Data Mining) library for curated features. Four different ML models are tested, with XGBoost (considering hyperparameter optimization via Optuna) leading to the highest performance. We further use SHAP to verify the resulting predictions, focusing on the ∼1500 materials displaying the lowest barrier values. As could be anticipated, we establish that the average valence electron count, electronegativity, and atomic number are typically the most relevant attributes to validate the ML model. However, we are also able to determine, for the different chalcogen atoms, which other few descriptors likewise considerably influence the adsorption properties. Our results show that when combined with interpretable ML protocols, EHM (and potentially semiempirical calculations in general) can produce a scalable framework for choosing 2D structures that exhibit the desired capture/release dynamics pertinent in a variety of utilization.

Identifiers

PMID42473098
PMCPMC13472046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.