ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Training Deep Learning Based Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction Using Synthetic Fractals.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate whether synthetically generated fractal data can be used to train deep learning (DL) models for dynamic MRI reconstruction, thereby avoiding the privacy, licensing, and availability limitations associated with cardiac MR training datasets.
methodsA training dataset was generated using quaternion Julia fractals to produce 2D + time images. Multi-coil MRI acquisition was simulated to generate paired fully sampled and radially undersampled k-space data. A 3D UNet deep artifact suppression model was trained using these fractal data (F-DL) and compared with identical models trained on natural videos (NV-DL) and cardiac MRI data (CMR-DL). All models were evaluated on prospectively acquired radial real-time cardiac MRI from 10 patients. Reconstructions were compared against compressed sensing (CS) and low-rank deep image prior (LR-DIP). All reconstructions were ranked for image quality, while ventricular volumes and ejection fraction were compared with reference breath-hold cine MRI.
resultsThere was no significant difference in qualitative ranking between F-DL, NV-DL, and CMR-DL (p > 0.75), while both outperformed CS and LR-DIP (p < 0.05). Ventricular volumes and function derived from F-DL were similar to CMR-DL, showing no significant bias and acceptable limits of agreement compared to reference cine imaging.
conclusionA DL model trained using synthetic fractal data reconstructed real-time cardiac MRI with image quality and clinical measurements comparable to a model trained on true cardiac MRI data. Fractal training data provide an open, scalable alternative to clinical datasets and may enable development of more generalisable DL reconstruction models for dynamic MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.