Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42473088›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026

Training Deep Learning Based Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction Using Synthetic Fractals.

Anirudh Raman, Olivier Jaubert, Mark Wrobel, Tina Yao, Ruaraidh Campbell, Rebecca R Baker, Ruta Virsinskaite, Daniel Knight, Michael Quail, Jennifer A Steeden and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anirudh RamanUCL Centre for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8301-0742
Olivier JaubertUCL Centre for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
Mark WrobelUCL Centre for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
Tina YaoUCL Centre for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
Ruaraidh CampbellUCL Centre for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7457-9065
Rebecca R BakerUCL Centre for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5016-7912
Ruta VirsinskaiteDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Daniel KnightUCL Centre for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
Michael QuailInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.
Jennifer A SteedenUCL Centre for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9792-2022
Vivek MuthuranguUCL Centre for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/W524335/1UK Research and Innovation MR/S032290/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate whether synthetically generated fractal data can be used to train deep learning (DL) models for dynamic MRI reconstruction, thereby avoiding the privacy, licensing, and availability limitations associated with cardiac MR training datasets.

methodsA training dataset was generated using quaternion Julia fractals to produce 2D + time images. Multi-coil MRI acquisition was simulated to generate paired fully sampled and radially undersampled k-space data. A 3D UNet deep artifact suppression model was trained using these fractal data (F-DL) and compared with identical models trained on natural videos (NV-DL) and cardiac MRI data (CMR-DL). All models were evaluated on prospectively acquired radial real-time cardiac MRI from 10 patients. Reconstructions were compared against compressed sensing (CS) and low-rank deep image prior (LR-DIP). All reconstructions were ranked for image quality, while ventricular volumes and ejection fraction were compared with reference breath-hold cine MRI.

resultsThere was no significant difference in qualitative ranking between F-DL, NV-DL, and CMR-DL (p > 0.75), while both outperformed CS and LR-DIP (p < 0.05). Ventricular volumes and function derived from F-DL were similar to CMR-DL, showing no significant bias and acceptable limits of agreement compared to reference cine imaging.

conclusionA DL model trained using synthetic fractal data reconstructed real-time cardiac MRI with image quality and clinical measurements comparable to a model trained on true cardiac MRI data. Fractal training data provide an open, scalable alternative to clinical datasets and may enable development of more generalisable DL reconstruction models for dynamic MRI.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFractalsHeartImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineAlgorithmsArtifactsHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID42473088
PMCPMC13619857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.