ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Comparative Performance Analysis of an Open Source Motion-Compensated Cardiac Diffusion Sequence Across Different MRI Systems and Gradient Strengths-A Pilot Study.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Performance Analysis of an Open Source Motion-Compensated Cardiac Diffusion Sequence Across Different MRI Systems and Gradient Strengths-A Pilot Study.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo validate the performance of an open-source cardiac diffusion sequence framework and to investigate hardware-based performance differences.
methodsThree second order motion compensated sequence files were compiled using Pulseq and applied across different MRI systems to image five volunteers. DTI and SNR analysis was performed to investigate protocol efficacy.
resultsThe sequences performed well at the task of imaging short axis views of the myocardium and producing data suitable for diffusion tensor imaging analysis. Significant differences in sequence performance across different systems and within the same system were revealed. Relative SNR utilizing the strongest available gradient system yielded up to 80% more SNR than the weakest tested system. Relative SNR obtained from the same sequence at different scanners differed by up to 42%, suggesting hardware impacts that warrant further investigation.
conclusionThe presented sequence framework allows for an easy starting point into cardiac diffusion tensor imaging and opens the door to further analysis of hardware impacts on performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.