ReviewPediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology2026
Oral food challenges in FPIES: A narrative review and proposals for emergency and home-based management of acute FPIES reaction.
Review in Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Oral food challenges in FPIES: A narrative review and proposals for emergency and home-based management of acute FPIES reaction.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated food allergy marked by delayed vomiting and potential hypovolemic shock. This review by the French FPIES working group (SFA, GFRUP, Sp2A, SFP) analyzes recent literature on oral food challenges (OFC) adverse reactions and proposes a standardized protocol for OFC and emergency management. Early consensus OFC protocols from 2017 showed limitations-mainly short intervals between doses during OFC and high hospitalization burdens-leading to inconsistent practices. This narrative review of 2017-2025 studies shows that a single 25% age-appropriate portion generally suffices to trigger symptoms, typically within 1-4 h. This approach balances safety and feasibility while reducing hospital time. As part of the French FPIES monitoring register, and to easily apply this portion, the serving size for each food has been established with specialized dieticians. According to severity, acute reactions require prompt rehydration and ondansetron. Oral or sublingual ondansetron, effective for mild to moderate reactions, can limit dehydration and hospital transfers. In a hospital setting, oral rehydration is indicated in mild reactions, whereas vascular hydration (10 mL/kg over 5-20 min) is required for moderate to severe reactions. Corticosteroids may be added in severe cases. Adrenaline is unnecessary unless associated IgE-mediated symptoms are observed. The working group also proposes including oral rehydration solution and ondansetron in every home emergency kit. These proposals provide a national consensus on the management of FPIES by standardizing French practice from the OFC to the acute management of allergic reaction both in hospitals and at home.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.