ArticleArtificial organs2026
An Optimized Multi-Stage Drainage Cannula Design for Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.
Article in Artificial organs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVenoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) is a life-saving therapy that provides cardiorespiratory support for cardiogenic shock patients. But, due to altered flow dynamics induced by VA ECMO drainage cannulas, complications such as thrombosis and hemolysis are common. Therefore, this study aimed to develop an optimized drainage cannula design with reduced complication risk using computational fluid dynamics (CFD).
methodsThe multi-objective optimization process entailed generating a response surface based on a design of experiments with n = 540 unique cannula designs. Minimizing pressure drop, maintaining > 100 mm/s tip velocity, and minimization of average wall shear stress were assigned as objective functions. The optimized design was then tested in three patient-specific geometries using CFD and compared against a clinically available model (Maquet).
resultsThe final design consisted of three rows of five side holes, with all side holes titled at an angle of 31.5°. When compared to the Maquet model, the optimized cannula generated lower stagnant blood volumes, increased cannula tip velocities (> 300 mm/s), and increased drainage from the upper body.
conclusionThe optimized cannula developed in this study demonstrated favorable flow dynamics that may increase flow and reduce the risk of life-threatening complications including thrombosis and hemolysis when translated to a clinical setting, thereby improving VA ECMO patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.