SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
Cochlear implantation in deafblind patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn the past, cochlear implantation (CI) was not commonly offered to this population due to concerns about limited auditory rehabilitation outcomes. Recent advancements in CI technology and multidisciplinary rehabilitation have expanded candidacy, but outcomes in deafblind patients remain underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize available evidence on CI outcomes in deafblind individuals.
methodsData sources included PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from inception to July 20, 2025. Observational studies included adults or children with confirmed dual sensory impairment after CI. Primary outcomes included speech clarity (Speech Intelligibility Rating [SIR]), verbal communication ability, and telephone communication competence. Secondary outcomes encompassed audiological performance, auditory and cognitive development, educational integration, psychological benefits, and advanced auditory skills. Risk of bias was examined using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. STATA 18 was used to perform random-effects meta-analyses.
resultsThirty-six studies were analyzed, including 491 patients (mean age 23.68 years; 23% male). The pooled mean SIR score was 3.45 (95% CI: 2.69-4.21), with no significant difference between Usher and non-Usher groups (p = 0. 52). Verbal communication ability was achieved in 70% (95% CI: 0.60-0.79), while telephone communication competence was limited to 51% (95% CI: 0.33-0.69).
conclusionCochlear implantation is an effective intervention for deafblind individuals, demonstrating significant improvements in speech intelligibility and verbal communication regardless of the underlying etiology (Usher vs. non-Usher). While verbal communication rates are promising, advanced skills such as telephone competence remain limited, suggesting the need for continued multidisciplinary rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.