Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42472933›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Temporal and speech outcomes in bimodal cochlear implant users: The effect of device delay mismatch.

Gökçe Gültekin, Halide Çetin Kara, Eyyup Kara, Fatih Öktem

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gökçe GültekinDepartment of Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Üsküdar University, Istanbul, Turkey. gokce.gultekin@uskudar.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7249-2097
Halide Çetin KaraCerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6747-7212
Eyyup KaraDepartment of Audiology, Faculty of Health Science, Istanbul University- Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4015-4560
Fatih ÖktemFatih Öktem Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0587-6637

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to characterize and compare the spectral-temporal features of speech, processing performance, and speech perception in noisy environments among bimodal cochlear implant (CI) users. Additionally, the study aims to examine intra-individual differences in synchronous and asynchronous use among individuals in whom the delay mismatch between the hearing aid (HA) and the CI has been reduced.

methodsForty-one bimodal cochlear implant users aged between 15 and 45 years participated in the study. Participants were divided into two groups based on the presence of the temporal synchronization (20 Cochlear, 21 MED-EL). In the first session, asynchronous data were collected using the Modulation Detection Threshold Test (easyMDT), Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT), Spectral-temporally Modulated Ripple Test (SMRT), and Turkish Matrix Test (TMT). For MED-EL users, the CI and HA were made temporally synchronized using a bimodal synchronization setting. In the second session, two CI programs were created, and all tests were repeated for synchronized fitting. In the programs, only the CI's speech processing strategies were used differently (HDCIS only and a combination of FSP and HDCIS).

resultsWithin the MED-EL users, synchronous mode comparisons demonstrated that the program using both strategies yielded improvements: a 2.3 ms reduction in RGDT composite score, a 1.31 dB decrease in easyMDT modulation detection threshold, a 5.56 dB SNR improvement in the Adaptive procedure of TMT, and a 6% increase in the Non-Adaptive procedure of TMT (p < 0.05).

conclusionsIn conclusion, the exploratory analysis suggests a possible relationship between temporal synchronization in bimodal CI use and outcomes related to temporal processing and speech perception in noise. Given the variability in inter-individual parameters, these findings should be considered preliminary and interpreted cautiously until confirmed by future controlled or longitudinal studies.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsHearing AidsSpeech PerceptionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultBimodal hearingCochlear implantDelay mismatchSpeech perception in noiseTemporal resolution

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.