Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42472932›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Diagnostic accuracy of imaging in facial nerve tumors.

José Manuel Morales-Puebla, Laura Ruano de Pablo, Manuel Varo Alonso, Amelia Fernández Zubillaga, Pilar García Raya, Luis Lassaletta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

José Manuel Morales-PueblaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, La Paz University Hospital, Paseo de la Castellana 261, Madrid, 28046, Spain. josemanuel.morales@salud.madrid.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3976-4019
Laura Ruano de PabloCentral Defence Hospital Gomez Ulla, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7579-8125
Manuel Varo AlonsoDepartment of Radiology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-9629-109X
Amelia Fernández ZubillagaDepartment of Radiology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4900-4131
Pilar García RayaDepartment of Radiology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2890-1410
Luis LassalettaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, La Paz University Hospital, Paseo de la Castellana 261, Madrid, 28046, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8260-4523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative imaging in patients with suspected primary facial nerve tumours and to assess interobserver agreement in radiological interpretation.

methodsA retrospective study included patients who underwent surgical treatment for suspected primary facial nerve tumours between 1990 and 2024. Concordance between the primary radiological diagnosis and histopathology was analysed. Diagnostic performance metrics were calculated using histopathology as the reference standard. A secondary blinded imaging review was performed by three radiologists. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa coefficients.

resultsTwenty-eight patients were included in the primary analysis. Schwannoma was the most frequent radiological diagnosis (53.6%) and histopathological subtype (50%). Overall concordance between the primary radiological diagnosis and histopathology was 57.1%. In the blinded radiological review (n = 23), diagnostic accuracy ranged from 47.8% to 60.9%. Overall interobserver agreement for the final diagnosis was fair (Fleiss' κ = 0.30). Accuracy was higher for common tumours (schwannomas and haemangiomas) than for rare tumours (68.9% vs. 25%, p = 0.001). Haemangioma showed high diagnostic performance (sensitivity and specificity) in the primary analysis but lower reproducibility in the blinded review.

conclusionPreoperative imaging shows moderate diagnostic accuracy and limited interobserver agreement. Diagnostic performance appears to be higher for common tumours such as schwannomas, whereas haemangiomas and other lesions may show more variable and less reproducible imaging features. Despite these limitations, imaging remains essential for tumour localisation and clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Cranial Nerve NeoplasmsFacial NerveFacial Nerve DiseasesHemangiomaNeurilemmomaAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesDiagnostic imagingFacial nerve neoplasmsHaemangiomaObserver variationSchwannoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.