SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
Combined cognitive behavioral therapy and sound therapy for chronic tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic tinnitus is a prevalent condition associated with significant distress and functional impairment. Despite various therapeutic attempts, there is currently no curative treatment. Although clinical management has advanced in recent years, overall outcomes remain unsatisfactory. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and sound therapy (ST) are established interventions; however, the efficacy of their combination (CBT + ST) relative to monotherapies or standard care remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of combined CBT and ST for adults with chronic tinnitus.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies published up to 12 December 2025. Studies involving adults with chronic subjective tinnitus receiving combined CBT + ST were included. Statistical analysis was performed using R software with a random-effects model. Continuous outcomes were analyzed as mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD), and dichotomous data as risk ratios (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics.
resultsOur review included four RCTs and one cohort with 610 participants. CBT + ST was associated with a statistically significant reduction in tinnitus-related handicap assessed by THI (MD = -8.72, 95% CI -13.23 to -4.20) with substantial heterogeneity, which resolved upon RCT-only analysis. Pooled sensitivity analysis of RCTs only showed that CBT + ST significantly reduced THI scores (MD = -11.19, 95% CI -14.67 to -7.70), exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) compared to ST alone. Our results yielded significant change in Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) (MD = -5.11, 95% CI -8.14 to -2.09), yet not clinically meaningful. No significant difference was found for subjective loudness assessed by Visual Analogue Scale/Numeric Rating Scale (VAS/NRS) (SMD = -0.29, 95% CI -0.62 to 0.03).
conclusionOur findings indicate that combined CBT and sound therapy might provide meaningful reductions in tinnitus-related distress and handicap (exceeding MCID thresholds for THI) in comparison to sound therapy alone. Benefits appear confined to distress and functional outcomes, with no significant effect on perceived loudness. These findings should be considered preliminary given the small number of studies, clinical heterogeneity, the inclusion of one retrospective cohort, and the absence of individual-level responder data. Future large-scale RCTs with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42472924What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.