Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42472922›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Dynamics of neural responsiveness in pediatric cochlear implant users.

Jaya Venkatagiri, Kamala Sarathy, Karthik Chandran Kamalakkannan, Muthukumar Ramamurthy, Bharathi Mohan Mathan Mohan, Nimesh Devassia, Nandini Dave Maingi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jaya VenkatagiriMadras Medical College & Rajiv Gandhi Govt General Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kamala SarathyMadras Medical College & Rajiv Gandhi Govt General Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Karthik Chandran KamalakkannanMadras Medical College & Rajiv Gandhi Govt General Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Muthukumar RamamurthyMadras Medical College & Rajiv Gandhi Govt General Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Bharathi Mohan Mathan MohanMadras Medical College & Rajiv Gandhi Govt General Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Nimesh DevassiaMED-EL India Private Ltd, New Delhi, India.
Nandini Dave MaingiMED-EL India Private Ltd, New Delhi, India. Nandini.Maingi@medel.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4698-4730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeElectrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) represent summation of action potentials generated by neurons of the auditory nerve in response to electrical stimulation. The slope of the ECAP amplitude growth function (AGF) reflects responsiveness or survival of neurons proximal to the stimulating electrode. Goals of the present study were to characterize the magnitude of the AGF slope by electrode site and over time in a cohort of pediatric CI users and measure the degree of correlation of slopes with auditory assessment results.

methods23 CI users participated in the study, ranging in age from 3 to 12 years. All implanted with 31.5 mm electrode array, full insertion. ECAP AGF slopes measured with all active electrodes intra-operatively, device switch-on, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months post switch-on. Auditory assessments administered at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months post-implantation. Analysis performed by electrode as well as intracochlear electrode site (basal, middle, and apical).

resultsAGF slopes significantly increased according to a basal-to-apical gradient. Slopes were more than twice as large at the apical-most electrode compared to the basal-most (43.1 vs. 20.3 µV/nC). AGF slopes stimulated from basal electrodes significantly increased over time, while those stimulated from apical electrodes significantly decreased over time. No statistically significant correlations were observed between AGF slopes and the test results of any auditory assessment at any timepoint.

conclusionObservations demonstrate AGF slopes vary substantially, both across the array and over time. No significant associations were observed between AGF slopes and auditory perception skills in this cohort. Due to our relatively small sample size and the heterogeneity of the data, no definitive conclusions regarding these associations can be made here.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsCochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsCochlear NerveEvoked Potentials, AuditoryChildChild, PreschoolElectric StimulationFemaleHumansMaleAmplitude growth functionCochlear implantECAPElectrophysiologyObjective measures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.